What Christians are claiming about the resurrection of Jesus is not that he rose by some natural processes. No, they say that he rose because God injected enormous power and energy from outside the system. Now, unless you have evidence that the system is totally causally closed, you cannot argue against the possibility of miracles.

Science does not define the limit of rationality; rationality is bigger than science.

My God is not a God of the gaps; he's the God of the whole show.

You say, "I believe in the laws of nature." Indeed, God who's responsible for them created an orderly universe. Otherwise, as I said before, we'd never recognize an exception. But God is not a prisoner of the laws. They're not like the laws of the United States. God who set the regularities there, can himself cause an event. Of course he can.

The existence of a mechanism that does something is not in itself an argument for the nonexistence of an agent who designed it.

We are dealing with two belief systems. One believes that this universe is the ultimate reality of mass energy. The other believes that God is the ultimate reality. And the burning question is, what evidence is there for the very task of either of them, the truth of either of them? And in particular, what way does science point?

If the thoughts in my mind are just the motions of atoms in my brain — a mechanism that has arisen by mindless, unguided processes — why should I believe anything that tells me, including the fact that it's made of atoms?