The Veritas Forum at Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments

Living Machines: Can Robots Become Human?

March 3, 2007 at (TBD)
(location TBD)
Presenters: Rosalind Picard, Founder and Director of the Affective Computing Research Group, MIT Media Laboratory
Rodney Brooks, Director of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and Panasonic Professor of Robotics

Can robots become human? Will we ever design life? Rodney Brooks, who engineers robots and self-identifies as a robot (and a human), and Rosalind Picard, who develops emotional interfaces in computers, dialogue about life, God, and robots. Each speaker begins with an opening presentation, followed by a moderator-guided discussion.

Invite a Friend   Tweet This   Post on Facebook


{{Text}}
Posted by {{UserName}} on {{DateCreated}} (delete)

First PagePrevious Page of 1 Next PageLast Page
To answer the question regarding robots becoming human one has to first of all clearly define what is meant by "robot" and "human". The dictionary definition of the former is as follows:

Definition of ROBOT

1 a : a machine that looks like a human being and performs various complex acts (as walking or talking) of a human being; also : a similar but fictional machine whose lack of capacity for human emotions is often emphasized b : an efficient insensitive person who functions automatically

2 : a device that automatically performs complicated often repetitive tasks

3 : a mechanism guided by automatic controls



And the definition of "human" is as follows:

Definition of HUMAN

1 : of, relating to, or characteristic of humans

2 : consisting of humans

3 a : having human form or attributes
b : susceptible to or representative of the sympathies and frailties of human nature


From the above, it is clear that a robot can never become human inasmuch as it always remains a artifice - however sophisticated. It is never able to possess the autonomy in activity that a human must possess in order to qualify as being human at all. Something autonomous, to the extent that it is so, simply cannot be an artifice - and vice versa.
Posted by Zik on 10/22/2011 8:16:50 AM
The videos for part 1 and part 2 seem to be the same...??
Posted by Julia Ma on 4/20/2011 4:51:51 PM


Post Comments

Login with existing account.
Login with facebook.
Login or Register to post a comment.

Login with Facebook
Schedule Presenters Sponsors Science vs. Faith?
How Do I Get Involved?
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • Flickr

 

Discussion Board

Below are discussions on 'Will Technology Save the World?'. ..more
Did you attend this event? Give us your feedback by following the link belo... ..more
Do advances in neuroscience and evolutionary psychology explain the developm... ..more

 

 

Veritas Books

A Place for Truth: Leading Thinkers Explore Life's Hardest QuestionsThe Dawkins Delusion: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the DivineFinding God Beyond Harvard: The Quest for VeritasFinding God at Harvard: Spiritual Journeys of Thinking ChristiansFinding Calcutta: What Mother Teresa Taught Me About Meaningful Work and Service

Support Veritas

Help students and faculty explore life's hardest questions
Support

Contact Us

Questions? Ideas?
Contact us anytime!
Contact

Explorer Newsletter

Sign up for our quarterly e-newsletter and notices about forums near you.